Georgia Tech Presentation

I wanted to thank everyone from the Velodrome that should up and added to the discussion following the presentation Wednesday. I was surprised to see so many folks considering the event wasn't really advertised outside of GT.

Following the presentation, the bike-geek within me thought it'd be cool to apply the project '96 formula to conditions at the Dick Lane Velodrome on a standard day. The table below lists times for 4000m individual pursuit, the average velocity the rider maintains AFTER they have accelerated up to speed*. I calculated the power requirement of two different conditions to illustrate a point about aerodynamics.

Power1 is the average power requirement for myself, my current bike/setup (round tube, wire wheels, with aero bars, regular bike shorts/jersey, aero helmet)

Power2 is the average power requirement for myself if I had an aero-frame/wheels, skinsuit, etc.

Time __ Velocity (kph) _ Power1(W) _ Power2 (W)
5:10 __ 47.36842105 ___ 351 _______ 312
5:05 __ 48.16053512 ___ 367 _______ 326
5:00 __ 48.97959184 ___ 384 _______ 341
4:55 __ 49.82698962 ___ 403 _______ 358
4:50 __ 50.70422535 ___ 423 _______ 375
4:45 __ 51.61290323 ___ 444 _______ 394
4:40 __ 52.55474453 ___ 467 _______ 414
4:35 __ 53.53159851 ___ 491 _______ 435
4:30 __ 54.54545455 ___ 517 _______ 458
4:25 __ 55.59845560 ___ 546 _______ 483
4:20 __ 56.69291339 ___ 576 _______ 510
4:15 __ 57.83132530 ___ 609 _______ 539
4:10 __ 59.01639344 ___ 645 _______ 570

The power requirement drops about 40-60 watts (depending on velocity). That was a lot larger range than I expected. Now, does any have any power data recorded during iPursuit? How does it compare? What was the temperature/pressure during that day? What equipment/setup was used?

Yet one more little geeky science experiment.

Thanks again to everyone, eventually once this crazy weather clears up, I hope to actually get out there and try this track stuff out.

Lee

*there are more sophisticated formula to calculate the cost of acceleration, I didn't use those due to time constraints but I'll try incorporate them into future models assuming the above output is at least reasonable.

Thanks!

I'm still learning about all of this type stuff. Thanks for posting.